Pump Rules Fans Outraged, Branding Her a “Monster”
Stassi Schroeder, former Vanderpump Rules star, is facing a wave of backlash after social media users accused her of mocking conservative commentator Charlie Kirk’s reported death. The controversy erupted when Schroeder launched what many are calling a tasteless “mourning wife” inspired merchandise and social media campaign, which critics say trivialized grief for the sake of profit.
The Controversial Move
Shortly after unverified rumors surrounding Charlie Kirk’s passing began circulating online, Schroeder posted a series of Instagram Stories promoting limited-edition products themed around being a “mourning wife.” While Schroeder framed the collection as a tongue-in-cheek commentary on modern celebrity branding, the timing struck many as deeply insensitive.
Fans and critics alike quickly drew connections between the campaign and the viral news of Kirk’s alleged death. Onlookers claimed Schroeder was leveraging a tragic headline for clout and financial gain.
“She is literally mocking death and grief to make money,” one Vanderpump Rules fan wrote on X (formerly Twitter). “This isn’t edgy humor—it’s heartless.”
Fan Reactions: Outrage and Disappointment
The backlash grew swiftly across fan communities. Longtime followers of Pump Rules—already familiar with Schroeder’s history of controversial remarks—expressed disappointment, labeling her actions as “calculated cruelty.”
Reddit threads on Vanderpump Rules fan forums lit up with heated debates. Some users suggested that Schroeder was once again proving her “tone-deaf” approach to public image management, while others argued she had crossed a line that couldn’t be brushed off as “dark humor.”
“Grief is not a punchline,” one commenter insisted. “Using someone’s death—even someone as divisive as Kirk—for a cash grab is monstrous.”
Schroeder’s Past With Controversy
This isn’t the first time Stassi Schroeder has been accused of insensitivity. She was previously fired from Vanderpump Rules in 2020 following backlash over racially insensitive actions and comments. While she has since tried to rebuild her public image through podcasts, books, and a rebranded social media presence, critics argue that stunts like this show she hasn’t learned from past mistakes.
Entertainment commentators note that Schroeder often courts controversy, whether intentionally or not, as a way to stay relevant in the reality TV orbit. However, the intensity of the current backlash suggests that fans may no longer be willing to separate her actions from her brand persona.
Silence From Schroeder
As of now, Schroeder has not publicly addressed the accusations. Her official Instagram account remains active, with promotional posts still live. Neither Bravo nor her podcasting partners have commented on the unfolding controversy.
Some fans speculate that her silence is an attempt to let the storm blow over, while others predict she may issue a statement soon in an effort to minimize the reputational damage.
The Bigger Picture
The incident raises larger questions about the ethics of influencer marketing and celebrity branding. In an era where tragedy is often commodified for clicks and profit, Schroeder’s actions have sparked a wider debate: should there be limits to what celebrities can monetize?
For now, the backlash shows no signs of slowing down. Hashtags like #StassiCancelled and #MonsterStassi are trending across platforms, with many demanding accountability. Whether this will impact her career long-term remains uncertain, but one thing is clear—her latest move has left a bitter taste in the mouths of fans and critics alike.
